Laugarvatn Fontana vs Blue Lagoon

Having enjoyed many supposedly touristy sights in the past, I found myself eager to experience the iconic Blue Lagoon. Therefore, I decided to visit both the Blue Lagoon and Laugarvatn Fontana, spending most of my time indulging in Icelandic spas.

Distinct Experiences: Laugarvatn Fontana vs. Blue Lagoon

Though both are spas in Iceland, Laugarvatn Fontana and the Blue Lagoon provide entirely different experiences. This article aims to help you determine which is best suited for your preferences.

Review of the Blue Lagoon

Before visiting, I had concerns, as many prior reviews warned of potential hair damage due to the mineral-rich waters. Additionally, I expected the space to be crowded, reducing the level of relaxation I sought.

To my surprise, though there were numerous visitors, the expansive space allowed for a sense of privacy. The air temperature of approximately 10 degrees Celsius combined with the 36-degree water temperature created a delightful thermal contrast, making for a refreshing experience.

Inside the Blue Lagoon, amenities include bars directly in the pool serving drinks and silica face masks, enhancing the pampering experience. Pricing for standard entry is approximately 40 Euros, which might seem steep, but considering Iceland’s overall high cost of living, this price felt fairly reasonable.

Review of Laugarvatn Fontana

I had much higher expectations for Laugarvatn Fontana, which is conveniently situated on the Golden Circle, making it easily accessible while still retaining a unique, less commercialized ambiance. Upon arrival, I was greeted by a series of interconnected outdoor mineral baths and steam rooms, all utilizing natural hot springs.

The experience at Fontana was notably tranquil, with significantly fewer visitors than at the Blue Lagoon, allowing ample space to relax without crowds. At a price point of around 30 Euros, Laugarvatn Fontana proves itself as a more affordable option while still providing a memorable spa experience.

Key Comparisons

• Scenery: Laugarvatn Fontana offers stunning lake views.
• Aesthetic Appeal: The Blue Lagoon is visually striking with its blue waters.
• Visitor Numbers: Laugarvatn Fontana is less crowded.
• Authenticity: Laugarvatn Fontana provides a more natural experience.
• Pricing: Laugarvatn Fontana is generally cheaper.

Conclusion

Ultimately, both the Blue Lagoon and Laugarvatn Fontana offer unique experiences that cater to different preferences. The Blue Lagoon may be known for its stunning visuals and iconic status, while Laugarvatn Fontana provides a serene and authentic alternative. Depending on your desires for relaxation, scenery, and price, you might find one spa more appealing than the other.

Whether you decide on the iconic Blue Lagoon or the tranquil Laugarvatn Fontana, each destination promises a memorable geothermal spa experience that should not be missed while visiting Iceland.